Access to Methotrexate Monitoring in Latin America: A Multicountry Survey of Supportive Care Capacity.

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is used to treat a broad spectrum of cancers. Methotrexate (MTX) monitoring and adequate supportive care are critical for safe drug administration; however, MTX level timing is not always possible in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate HDMTX supportive care capacity and MTX monitoring practices in Latin America (LATAM) to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. A multicenter survey was conducted among LATAM pediatric oncologists. Twenty healthcare providers from 20 institutions answered the online questionnaire. HDMTX was used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; 100%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (84.2%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (47.4%), osteosarcoma (78.9%), and medulloblastoma (31.6%). Delays in starting HDMTX infusion were related to bed shortages (47.4%) and MTX shortages (21.1%). MTX monitoring was performed at an in-hospital laboratory in 52%, at an external/nearby laboratory in 31.6%, and was not available in 10.5%. Median interval between sampling and obtaining MTX levels was ≤ 2 h in 45% and ≥ 6 h in 30%, related to laboratory location. Sites without access to MTX monitoring reduced the MTX dose for patients with high-risk ALL or did not include MTX in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma. Respondents reported that implementation of point-of-care testing of MTX levels is feasible. In LATAM, highly variable supportive care capacity may affect the safe administration of MTX doses. Improving accessibility of MTX monitoring and the speed of obtaining results should be prioritized to allow delivery of full doses of MTX required by the current protocols.

A Systematic Review of High-Dose Methotrexate for Adults with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is confined within the CNS. Due to its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is the backbone for induction chemotherapy. This systematic review was conducted to observe outcomes among different HDMTX doses (low, <3 g/m2; intermediate, 3-4.9 g/m2; high, ≥5 g/m2) and regimens used in the treatment of PCNSL. A PubMed search resulted in 26 articles reporting clinical trials using HDMTX for PCNSL, from which 35 treatment cohorts were identified for analysis. The median dose of HDMTX used for induction was 3.5 g/m2 (interquartile range IQR, 3-3.5); the intermediate dose was most frequently used in the studies examined (24 cohorts, 69%). Five cohorts used HDMTX monotherapy, 19 cohorts used HDMTX + polychemotherapy, and 11 cohorts used HDMTX + rituximab ± polychemotherapy. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) estimates for low, intermediate, and high dose HDMTX cohorts were 71%, 76%, and 76%, respectively. Pooled 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for low, intermediate, and high HDMTX dose cohorts were 50%, 51%, and 55%, respectively. Regimens that included rituximab showed a tendency to have higher ORR and 2-year PFS than those that did not include rituximab. These findings indicate that current protocols utilizing 3-4 g/m2 of HDMTX in combination with rituximab provide therapeutic efficacy in PCNSL.

Tana, a Healthcare Chatbot to Help Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a University Hospital in Argentina.

A Chatbot or Conversational Agent is a computer application that simulates the conversation with a human person (by text or voice), giving automated responses to people's needs. In the healthcare domain, chatbots can be beneficial to help patients, as a complement to care by health personnel, especially in times of high demand or constrained resources such as the COVID-19 Pandemic. In this paper we share the design and implementation of a healthcare chatbot called Tana at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Considering best practices and being aware of possible unintended consequences, we must take advantage of information and communication technologies, such as chatbots, to analyze and promote useful conversations for the health of all people.

Antipsychotic Use and Bloodstream Infections Among Adult Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Mounting evidence suggests that antipsychotics may have immunomodulatory effects, but their impact on disseminated infections remains unknown. This study thus sought to estimate the effect of antipsychotic treatment on the occurrence of bloodstream infection during long-term follow-up in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study, with new user and active comparator design, included adult patients seen from January 2008 to June 2018 in a tertiary teaching hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. New users of antipsychotic drugs were compared to new users of any benzodiazepine. The primary outcome of interest was incident bloodstream infection at 1 year of follow-up. Propensity score methods and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to adjust for baseline confounding. RESULTS: A total of 923 patients were included in the present analysis. Mean (SD) age was 75.0 (9.8) years, and 51.9% of patients were female. The cumulative incidence of bloodstream infections at 1 year was 6.0% and 2.3% in the antipsychotic and benzodiazepine groups, respectively. Antipsychotic use was associated with a higher risk of bloodstream infections during the first year of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.41; 95% CI, 1.13 to 5.14) compared to benzodiazepine use. Antipsychotics with high dopamine receptor affinity presented greater risk than less selective agents (HR = 5.20; 95% CI, 1.53 to 17.67). CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic use is associated with bloodstream infections during the first year of follow-up in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and evaluate this effect in a broader population of patients.

Predictores del uso off-label de rituximab en pacientes adultos: un estudio piloto / Off-label use of rituximab and associated factors in adult patients: a pilot study abstract

Introducción: comprender los factores que condicionan el uso off-label de los agentes monoclonales es crucial para su utilización racional. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue describir la prevalencia de uso off-label de rituximab y los factores médicos, clínicos y socioeconómicos que se vinculan con dicha práctica. Métodos: estudio de corte transversal retrospectivo. Incluimos pacientes adultos con una primera indicación de rituximab entre 2010 y 2016. La exposición primaria fue definida como el momento de la pérdida de patente de rituximab. Otros factores considerados fueron el diagnóstico de base y las comorbilidades, así como también datos referentes a los médicos tratantes. El evento primario fue la prevalencia de prescripción off-label de rituximab. Utilizamos un modelo de regresión logística para estimar la asociación entre el tiempo y el evento primario. Resultados: de 160 pacientes adultos que iniciaron tratamiento con rituximab y fueron potencialmente elegibles se tomó una muestra aleatoria; 22 de ellos fueron incluidos en el análisis final. La prevalencia de uso off-label fue del 30,4% (IC 95%, 13,9 a 54,9%). No evidenciamos un cambio en el patrón de prescripción de rituximab asociado al tiempo de caída de la patente. El único factor predictor de dicho uso fueron las internaciones previas (7 vs. 1, p = 0,04). Conclusión: el uso off-label de rituximab es frecuente en nuestra población. Futuros estudios deberían estar dirigidos a determinar los factores asociados a esta práctica, así como a estimar el impacto en términos de eficacia y potencial toxicidad en esta población. (AU)

Background: the description of those characteristics that are associated with the off-label use of monoclonal antibodies remains paramount if we are to maximize the rational use of available resources. Our main objective was to describe the prevalence of off-label use of Rituximab, in addition to its associated factors (for example, prescribing physician and patient´s clinical and socioeconomic characteristics). Methods: we designed a retrospective cross-sectional study which included patients starting treatment with Rituximab between 2010 and 2016. Our main exposure was the time when Rituximab´s patent expired. Other potential factors associated with the off-label prescription pattern were baseline diagnosis and comorbidities in addition to the main characteristics of the prescribing physician. The main outcome was the prevalence of off-label use of Rituximab. We used a multivariate logistic regression model in order to estimate the association between time and our main endpoint. Results: out of 160 eligible patients that started treatment with Rituximab we included 22 adult patients in our main analysis by conducting a random sampling procedure. The prevalence of off-label use was 30.4% (95% CI, 13.9 to 54.9%). We did not find a change in the prescription pattern of Rituximab with regards to time and patent expiration. The only factor associated with off-label use were previous hospitalizations (7 vs. 1, p = 0.04). Conclusions: the off-label use of Rituximab is common in our population. Future studies evaluating distinct factors associated with such use as well as its impact in both potential efficacy and toxicity are warranted. (AU)